Relevance has a half-life.
Publish while it matters.
Your firm stays visible. Every piece of content goes out with a compliance workup behind it. Before your approver even opens the file.
Generic content gets generic results. The review process trained your firm to play it safe. TIME changes what you are willing to publish.
Waiting costs you.
That is why TIME exists.
What if the cycle was minutes?
The content your firm stopped publishing goes out while it matters. Timely. Meaningful. The kind that grows AUM and earns higher fees. Not the safe version. The real one.
Your content. Full workup.
Before you commit to anything.
What your approver opens. Minutes after you hit submit.
Every provision mapped. Every finding resolved. Every revision prepared.
One submission. One workup. One decision.
Three steps. No back-and-forth. No weeks of revision cycles. Your content is ready while the idea still matters.
The advisor sees what to fix. Your compliance team sees why.
Clear. Direct. Actionable.
Did this pass? If not, what is blocking it? How do I fix it right now?
Every module surfaces blockers with plain-language guidance, recommended rewrites, and exactly what needs to change to reach approval.
The goal: send content to your compliance team already close to approvable. Fewer revision cycles. Faster approvals.
Evidence-backed. Rule-linked. Documented.
The full analytical workup your compliance team would build if they had unlimited time. All 22 provisions evaluated. Every finding tied to the specific rule language an examiner would reference.
What would take a team of analysts days to assemble is already done. The human decision is the only one left.
One rule. Everything it touches. Nothing generic.
TIME is not a compliance platform adapted for advisory firms. It is purpose-built for SEC Marketing Rule 206(4)-1 and the content it governs. Social posts. Market commentary. Presentations. Podcasts. Video. Anything a firm publishes to grow.
The screening, the enrichment, the reporting, and the resolution guidance are all built against how the SEC examines content and what they look for when they do.
Refined across real and simulated advisory content. Calibrated to distinguish a blocker from a heads-up.
What changes when the groundwork is already done.
| Manual review | With TIME |
|---|---|
| Ten posts, a market commentary, and a slide deck land the same week. The compliance team works through them one at a time. | Submit everything at once. TIME processes social posts, documents, decks, audio, and video in parallel. No queue. |
| The interpretation lives in one person’s memory. If they leave, the institutional knowledge goes with them. | The reasoning lives in the report. Rule references, evidence, and analysis are documented regardless of who reviews it. |
| When a question comes up later, the audit trail has to be pieced together from email threads and recollection. | The evidence chain is captured as part of the workflow. Screening ID, content fingerprint, and decision trail are preserved. |
| Every piece starts from zero. Someone reads it, rebuilds the context, maps it to the rules, and builds the case before approval can begin. That cycle happens every single time. | The analytical groundwork is already done. Your approver starts at the decision, not the reconstruction. |
Built for firms where growth and compliance both have to win.
No. TIME does the analytical workup. Approval stays with the human approver.
A general model can help draft. It cannot hand your approver a rule-linked workup, evidence chain, provision matrix, and documented record they can stand behind. TIME is built around that workflow.
No AI analysis is perfect. No human review is perfect either. That is why TIME is designed to work with your approver, not replace them. What makes it different is depth. TIME is the only system purpose-built for SEC Marketing Rule 206(4)-1, calibrated against 3,200+ real advisory submissions. Social posts. Market commentaries. Client presentations. Webinar transcripts. A second set of eyes that never gets tired, never skims, and never assumes the last reviewer caught everything. Your approver brings the judgment. TIME brings the groundwork. Together, the coverage is stronger than either one alone.
Most firms do. The issue is not whether a process exists. It is how much time and effort it requires each time, and what that friction has taught the firm to stop attempting.
Often the firm publishes less because the workflow taught it not to try. If timing, commentary, advisor participation, or recruiting visibility matter, the burden is shaping behavior more than it looks.
That is what the product is built to do. The workup arrives ready for a decision, not for reconstruction. The human approver stays in control. The goal is to make compliance easier to do well.
Your outside compliance advisor or CCO still makes the final call. TIME does the analytical workup so they start with a finished analysis instead of a blank page. The relationship does not change. The turnaround does. And the volume of content they can support goes up significantly.
Your content is processed securely and never shared. Screening results are confidential to your firm. TIME does not train on your content or use it for any purpose beyond your screening.
What founding firms get.
Capacity is limited by design. Founding firms get direct access, locked pricing, and priority processing from day one.
Your content is aging in a queue right now.
Every week that cycle stays the same, your competitors publish more. You publish less.
TIME compresses the cycle to minutes. Your compliance team gets the analytical groundwork. Your firm gets back in the conversation.
We accept a limited number of firms. Seats fill quietly. Selected firms are screening real content within 48 hours.